The table below gives the speed of a maglev train at different times:
Time in minutes [t]: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Speed in mph [ v(t) ]: 0 3 12 27 48 75 108 147 192
Consider the time interval [0,2]. This is mathematical notation for the time interval between t=0 and t=2, i.e., for the interval 0 ≤ t ≤ 2. What is an upper bound for the number of miles the train covered during the time interval [0,2]?
Although you do not know what the speed of the train is at all times (e.g. you are not told what the speed is when t=4.5), you have enough information to find an upper bound for how many miles were logged during [0,2]. Think about what you do know about the train's speed during this time interval, and about the length of the time interval.
(a) An upper bound for the number of miles logged during [0,2] is:__________. (Warning: remember units! 1 minute is 1/60 hours) (b) Similarly, An upper bound for the number of miles logged during [1,3] is:__________. (c) and a lower bound for the number of miles logged during [1,3] is:__________.
Explain in careful, precise, full sentences (which a classmate
would understand) how you got these answers, and why they are valid:
Explain where, and how, you used the assumption about increasing
speed. Why would your answers not (necessarily) be correct were
this assumption violated?
Your estimate of the number of miles logged during [1,3]: __________ and you can make a guarantee to the train station operators. Namely, for your estimate, although it may not be exactly equal to the correct total number of miles the train logged during [1,3], you can guarantee that your error is no larger than _________miles. That is, the difference between your estimate of __________miles and the number of miles the train actually logged between t=1 and t=3 is no more than __________ (your last two fill-in-the-blank answers are of course the same as your previous two).
Now, explain (as always, this means in full, complete, accurate,
and specific sentences which others can follow, and which are
convincing!) how you chose your estimate, and prove that (i.e.,
give a convincing argument that) your error "is no more than _____
(whatever answer you gave)":
Now fill in the following table, in which "lower bound" means "lower bound for miles logged this interval" and similarly for upper bound. "Your Estimate" is short for "Your estimate of how many miles the train logged (traveled) during this time interval", and "Your error-bound" is short for "you guarantee that your estimate for this interval is no more than _____ miles off"
| Time interval: | Lower bound: | Upper bound: | Your estimate: | Your Error-bound: |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [0,1] | ||||
| [1,2] | ||||
| [2,3] | 0.325 miles | 0.125 miles | ||
| [3,4] | ||||
| [4,5] | ||||
| [5,6] | ||||
| [6,7] | ||||
| [7,8] |
| Time interval: | Lower bound: | Upper bound: | Your estimate: | Your Guarantee: |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [0,8] |
| Time:
(in minutes) | Approximate odometer reading: | Error-bound: | Exact odometer reading: |
|---|---|---|---|
| t = 0 | |||
| t = 1 | |||
| t = 2 | |||
| t = 3 | 0.475 miles | ||
| t = 4 | |||
| t = 5 | |||
| t = 6 | |||
| t = 7 | |||
| t = 8 |
Using your knowledge of Differential Calculus, you know that since
the distance from the train's base station at time t is given by (1/60)* t3, it must be that the velocity at
time t, or v(t), is given by the formula __________ in miles per
minute; thus, v(t) = __________ in miles per hour Verify this
last equation by looking at the data in the initial page 1 chart of
speeds for t=0 through t=8 -- check it!
| v(t)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|_____________________________________________________________________t___
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (in minutes)
Now draw rectangles whose areas are equal to the "lower bound" for
each interval [0,1], [1,2], [2,3], etc. Then draw (in another color if
possible) rectangles with a greater height, whose area equals each of
your "upper bound" answers. Can you find an area representation for
your "error-bound" answers (we are talking about the
"elapsed distance" table here, NOT the odometer readings table).
Without necessarily carrying out the exercise, what would happen if you used your v(t) to create an odometer chart with estimates every 0.25 miles. Would your odometer estimates (i.e., your estimates of "elapsed distance") be any better? Why or why not?
Finally, explain how your estimates involving trains, speeds,
odometers, etc, when looked at graphically, look like the areas of
rectangles being used as an approximation for areas under the graphs
of a function.