|
In late summer and early fall of 2005, gas prices in the United
States skyrocketed from an average of about $2 per gallon ($2/gal) to
about $3 per gallon ($3/gal) in the aftermath of hurricanes Katrina
and Rita, as well as in the face of limits to the growth of global oil
supplies. The latter are expected to persist and prices of $3/gal or
higher may return.
What would the "effect on your pocketbook" be? The
answer to this question depends on your situation, a fact you will
quantify in the exploration below. |
A somewhat less obvious factor, however, is your income. If your income is lower, then for any given level of gas spending on dollars, it is a higher percent of your total income. Let's suppose the price of gas average $2/gallon this year, and will average $3/gallon next year (a 50% increase).
A. Sally and Wendy
Soccer-mom Sally owns a very large SUV that gets 10 mpg (miles per gallon). Working class Wendy owns a smaller, more efficient car, that got 20 mpg when new but gets only 15 mpg today since it's now an old car.
Both Wendy and Sally have somewhat long commutes of about 30 miles each way. If their work commute is two ways times 5 days per week, their weekly mileage for work related driving is __________ per week. You also know that Sally's annual salary is $60,000 while Wendy's is $18,000.
On the next page, after reading each step through very carefully, you will fill out a comparative table for Sally and Wendy. Before you do so, list several (at least two) findings you expect a comparison of effects of the price of gas on them:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
| Soccer-mom Sally | Working-class Wendy |
|---|---|
| Gallons of gas used for weekly commute:
__________ | Gallons of gas used for weekly commute:
__________ |
| Converting at (roughly) 4 weeks per month,
_____gal/mo for work commute | Converting at (roughly) 4 weeks per month,
_____gal/mo for work commute |
| At $2/gallon, monthly cost of
work commute: $_____ | At $2/gallon, monthly cost of
work commute: $_____ |
| Monthly income excluding taxes: $__________ | Monthly income excluding taxes: $__________ |
| What percent of income excluding
taxes goes to commute? ____% | What percent of income excluding
taxes goes to commute? ____% |
| At $3/gallon, monthly cost of
work commute: $_____ | At $3/gallon, monthly cost of
work commute: $_____ |
| What percent of income excluding
taxes goes to commute? ____% | What percent of income excluding
taxes goes to commute? ____% |
| By how many percentage points did
the gas part of the budget increase? ____% | By how many percentage points did
the gas part of the budget increase? ____% |
Your Notes:
B. What's the "gas bite" for lower-income Americans?
Let's now answer to the above questions for an American who is among the "working poor" -- a lower-income American (call her Rachel Ragamuffin) whose annual salary is $12,000. Assume she has the same type of car as Working Class Wendy, and drives the same number of miles per week

C. How does the "gas bite" cut into the rest of your budget?

| Summarizing Your Findings:
How can we quantify "by how much" each person's gas bill goes up (Despite the fact that Soccer-mom Sally's car gets the lowest mileage)? | ||
|---|---|---|
| Soccer-mom Sally | Working Class Wendy | Rachel (Working Poor) |
| Monthly gas bill goes up by 2.4 percentage points (I.e., from ______% to _____%) | Monthly gas bill goes up by 5.33 percentage points (I.e., from ______% to _____%) | Monthly gas bill goes up by 8 percentage points (I.e., from ______% to _____%) |
| By how much must her budget for "Everything else" decrease?
(Even putting aside that Rachel's "Everything else" budget was lower than Wendy's -- and Wendy's lower than Sally's -- to begin with) | ||
| Budget for "everything else" must decrease by ___% | Budget for "everything else" must decrease by ___% | Budget for "everything else" must decrease by ___% |

D. How big a difference?
It is commonly estimated that roughly 66% (or two-thirds)of a household's budget is spent on food and shelter (rent or mortgage, heat/utilities, etc).
We already saw how what income level you have affects what percent of your income gas "eats up". But since you have to eat and have shelter, and if your situation is that you have to drive to work, this brings up a new question: how big an effect does one's income have on on what percent of your budget is left over for "everything else" -- everything excluding food/shelter and gas? To explore this, fill out the table below.
| Total Budget | Gas | Food/Shelter | "Everything else" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soccer-mom Sally: | 100% | 7% | 66% | ________% or about what fraction? ____ |
| Working-class Wendy: | 100% | 16% | 66% | ________% or about what fraction? ____ |
| Rachel | 100% | 24% | 66% | ________% or about what fraction? ____ |
Does this shed light on the frequently-heard comment that gas prices "bite hardest" in lower-income communities? Not only is Working-class Wendy's total budget lower than Soccer-mom Sally's total budget, but Wendy also has a smaller percent (or that smaller budget) leftover for "everything else" than Sally has. In fact, by what fraction is Wendy's budget-percent for "everything else" lower than Sally's?
The answer: Wendy's budget-percent for "Everything else" is about 20% while Sally's is about 30% so Wendy's budget-percent for Everything Else is about one-third lower than Sally's. Instead of having about 3/10 of her budget for "Everything else", as Sally does, Wendy's budget is both lower in absolute terms and, on top of that, the percentage of that (lower) budget available for Everything Else is also lower.
By what fraction is Rachel's budget-percent for "everything else" lower than Wendy's?
___________________________________________________________________________
What would be the effect on your own life if the percentage of your budget available for "Everything else" was similarly cut?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
By what fraction is Rachel's budget-percent for "everything else" lower than Sally's?
How significant does that (perhaps modest looking) "8 percent" difference seen earlier seem now, in terms of how it would affect Rachel's life? How does our choice of which numbers to look at affect how we see, or which aspects are clear within, a given real-world life situation?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: as many have pointed out, gasoline
is environmentally destructive and "should cost more, not less". This
is an important issue, however economic and other forms of equity are
another dimension; does society lower fossil fuel usage in an
equitable way (such as offsetting higher a gas tax with tax cuts
having a lower-income focus), so everyone conserves, or do the wealthy
continue to drive polluting SUVs while the poor can't afford to drive
to work? The above exploration is structured to help you analyze (and
to numerically quantify) some economic impacts of higher prices
for gasoline as they manifest in personal budgets. Many other dimensions
are certainly worthy of being explored elsewhere. If you wish to
explore such dimensions (or how they inter-relate) you may ask your
instructor in this or a future course, about the potential for such an
assignment. In the meantime what your thoughts in brief on balancing
economic equity with protecting the environment for ourselves and
future generations?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
FAIR USE NOTICE: This assignment contains copyrighted
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized
by the copyright owner. We are including such material in our efforts
to advance understanding of mathematical, quantitative, environmental,
sociological, or other academic-discipline based issues. We believe
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this activity is
distributed without profit to instructors who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the such instructional resources for research
and/or educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner.
Created 2000-2006 by Dr. Harel Barzilai.
Some rights
reserved.
Reproduction and use with attribution for noncommercial educational
purposes is permitted and encouraged. Details at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/
Acknowledgement:
Part of this work was made possible with kind support (Fall
2005-Spring 2006) from the Professional Development Mentors Program
(PDMP) at Salisbury University, a collaboration of the Faculty
Development and the Learning Technology committees.