HW: How can a 20% 'cut' equal a 2% increase?!?
"In April 2007, Canada's Environment Minister John Baird announced new targets to reduce Canada's GHG emissions to 20% below the 2006 level by 2020, and to 60-70% below the 2006 level by 2050.

"This would leave Canada's emissions about 2% above the 1990 level in 2020 and would reduce them to [about 55.5%] below the 1990 level by 2050."
[Source: http://climate.pembina.org/issues/longer-term-targets]

Directions: Let B=the 2006 emissions level for Canada, and let A be the 1990 emission level.

(a) Explain why the first statement implies that (0.8)B = (1.02)A

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

(b) Solve for B in terms of A; that is, find a constant k such that B=kA

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

(c) Now carry out steps similar to those in (a) and (b) above, only base your equations on the assertion that "..and would reduce them to [about 55.5%] below the 1990 level by 2050" part, until you again obtain B=qA for some constant q

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

(d) How close are k and q?

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________